On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:14:54AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > On 04/12/20 at 10:48pm, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt****@linux*****> > > > > The free_area_init_node() is only used by x86 to initialize a memory-less > > nodes. > > Make its name reflect this and drop all the function parameters except node > > ID as they are anyway zero. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt****@linux*****> > > --- > > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 5 +---- > > include/linux/mm.h | 9 +++------ > > mm/page_alloc.c | 7 ++----- > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > > index fe024b2ac796..8ee952038c80 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > > @@ -737,12 +737,9 @@ void __init x86_numa_init(void) > > > > static void __init init_memory_less_node(int nid) > > { > > - unsigned long zones_size[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0}; > > - unsigned long zholes_size[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0}; > > - > > /* Allocate and initialize node data. Memory-less node is now online.*/ > > alloc_node_data(nid); > > - free_area_init_node(nid, zones_size, 0, zholes_size); > > + free_area_init_memoryless_node(nid); > > > > /* > > * All zonelists will be built later in start_kernel() after per cpu > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > > index 1c2ecb42e043..27660f6cf26e 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > > @@ -2272,8 +2272,7 @@ static inline spinlock_t *pud_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud) > > } > > > > extern void __init pagecache_init(void); > > -extern void __init free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long * zones_size, > > - unsigned long zone_start_pfn, unsigned long *zholes_size); > > +extern void __init free_area_init_memoryless_node(int nid); > > extern void free_initmem(void); > > > > /* > > @@ -2345,10 +2344,8 @@ static inline unsigned long get_num_physpages(void) > > > > /* > > * Using memblock node mappings, an architecture may initialise its > > - * zones, allocate the backing mem_map and account for memory holes in a more > > - * architecture independent manner. This is a substitute for creating the > > - * zone_sizes[] and zholes_size[] arrays and passing them to > > - * free_area_init_node() > > + * zones, allocate the backing mem_map and account for memory holes in an > > + * architecture independent manner. > > * > > * An architecture is expected to register range of page frames backed by > > * physical memory with memblock_add[_node]() before calling > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index 376434c7a78b..e46232ec4849 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -6979,12 +6979,9 @@ static void __init __free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long *zones_size, > > free_area_init_core(pgdat); > > } > > > > -void __init free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long *zones_size, > > - unsigned long node_start_pfn, > > - unsigned long *zholes_size) > > +void __init free_area_init_memoryless_node(int nid) > > { > > - __free_area_init_node(nid, zones_size, node_start_pfn, zholes_size, > > - true); > > + __free_area_init_node(nid, NULL, 0, NULL, false); > > Can we move free_area_init_memoryless_node() definition into > arch/x86/mm/numa.c since there's only one caller there? > > And I am also wondering if adding a wrapper > free_area_init_memoryless_node() is necessary if it's only called the > function free_area_init_node(). Yeah, I think this patch can be entirely dropped and the next one could be slightly updated :) Thanks! > > } > > > > #if !defined(CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP) -- > > 2.25.1 > > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
Fork