Revisão | 49921d6886c54ec8727f2253b7698f173166bbd3 (tree) |
---|---|
Hora | 2017-06-07 07:25:14 |
Autor | David Hildenbrand <david@redh...> |
Commiter | Richard Henderson |
target/s390x: addressing exceptions are suppressing
We have to make the address in the old PSW point at the next
instruction, as addressing exceptions are suppressing and not
nullifying.
I assume that there are a lot of other broken cases (as most instructions
we care about are suppressing) - all trigger_pgm_exception() specifying
and explicit number or ILEN_LATER look suspicious, however this is another
story that might require bigger changes (and I have to understand when
the address might already have been incremented first).
This is needed to make an upcoming kvm-unit-test work.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170529121228.2789-1-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int s390_cpu_handle_mmu_fault(CPUState *cs, vaddr orig_vaddr, | ||
204 | 204 | if (raddr > ram_size) { |
205 | 205 | DPRINTF("%s: raddr %" PRIx64 " > ram_size %" PRIx64 "\n", __func__, |
206 | 206 | (uint64_t)raddr, (uint64_t)ram_size); |
207 | - trigger_pgm_exception(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ILEN_LATER); | |
207 | + trigger_pgm_exception(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ILEN_LATER_INC); | |
208 | 208 | return 1; |
209 | 209 | } |
210 | 210 |